Plebgate costs sanctions judgment to go to the Court of Appeal

Master McCloud’s judgment limiting the costs which Andrew Mitchell MP can recover in his libel case (I wrote about that – see New costs management litigation budget rules claim Plebgate victim) is to be heard by the Court of Appeal.

This reflects the importance which is being attached to early clarification of issues which arise from the Jackson reforms which took effect on 1 April. Five appeal judges, including Lord Justice Jackson himself, have been appointed to hear such appeals. My view is that the Master was given no option by the express wording of the sanction specifically provided for in the rules:


…with her room to order otherwise trammelled by the policy made clear in the Master of the Rolls’ speech about relief from sanctions (see my earlier article for a summary of this). Whether the policy is right is a different matter – I think it is (sorry), but that is distinct from my conclusion that the Master was right.

There is more information about this in an article in the Lawyer called CA to hear “plebgate” costs challenge after High Court cuts libel budget.


About Chris Dale

I have been an English solicitor since 1980. I run the e-Disclosure Information Project which collects and comments on information about electronic disclosure / eDiscovery and related subjects in the UK, the US, AsiaPac and elsewhere
This entry was posted in Court Rules, CPR, Jackson Reforms, Litigation. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s